NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 113.6x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 12500 million
- 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 11300
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 11925
- Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 11925
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 19 March 2019 |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 12500 million |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 vs 11300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 vs 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 vs 11925 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1035 MHz
- Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 705
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3346
- 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3346
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3714
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3714
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1035 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 vs 705 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 vs 3346 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 vs 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 vs 3714 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | 784 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 14832 | 11300 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19565 | 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19565 | 11925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 10411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 10411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3947 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3947 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53445 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Vega 10 PRO |
Code name | TU104 | Greenland |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 19 March 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 175 | 228 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
GCN generation | GCN 5.0 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1035 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 296.6 GFLOPS | 499.2 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 18.98 TFLOPS | 15.97 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.492 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3072 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | 83.20 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 296.6 GTexel/s | 249.6 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt | 12500 million |
Transistor count | 13600 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.3 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 402.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 2048 bit |
Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Memory clock speed | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | |
Technologies |
||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) |