NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
  • Around 19% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1300 MHz
  • Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 113.6x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 12500 million
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 8 GB
  • Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 11300
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 11925
  • Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 11925
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 19 March 2019
Boost clock speed 1545 MHz vs 1300 MHz
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s vs 249.6 GTexel/s
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt vs 12500 million
Maximum memory size 16 GB vs 8 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 14832 vs 11300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 vs 11925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 vs 11925

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1035 MHz
  • Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 784 vs 705
  • 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 vs 3346
  • 3.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 vs 3346
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3947 vs 3714
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3947 vs 3714
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 1035 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 784 vs 705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 10411 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 10411 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3947 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3947 vs 3714

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
705
784
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
14832
11300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
11925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
11925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
10411
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
10411
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3947
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
3947
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
PassMark - G2D Mark 705 784
PassMark - G3D Mark 14832 11300
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 11925
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 11925
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 10411
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 10411
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 3947
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 3947
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0
Geekbench - OpenCL 53445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 135.416
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 3063.269
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 12.678
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 883.876

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

Essentials

Architecture Turing Vega 10 PRO
Code name TU104 Greenland
Launch date 27 May 2019 19 March 2019
Place in performance rating 175 228
Type Laptop Desktop
GCN generation GCN 5.0

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1545 MHz 1300 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 296.6 GFLOPS 499.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 18.98 TFLOPS 15.97 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 9.492 TFLOPS 7.987 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072 3072
Pixel fill rate 98.88 GPixel/s 83.20 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s 249.6 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 12500 million
Transistor count 13600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None
Width IGP

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.1
OpenCL 1.2 2.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4 6.3
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 402.4 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit 2048 bit
Memory type GDDR6 HBM2
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Memory clock speed 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)

Technologies

Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)