NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
  • Around 1% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1530 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 771 vs 742
  • Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12499 vs 11403
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 13044
  • Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 13044
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Boost clock speed 1545 MHz vs 1530 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt vs 230 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 771 vs 742
PassMark - G3D Mark 12499 vs 11403
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 vs 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 vs 13044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1035 MHz
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3346
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3346
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3714
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3714
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1200 MHz vs 1035 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7164 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7164 vs 3714

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
771
742
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
12499
11403
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19565
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3346
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3714
7164
Name NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G2D Mark 771 742
PassMark - G3D Mark 12499 11403
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19565 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19565 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3346 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3346 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3714 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3714 7164
Geekbench - OpenCL 186736
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture Turing GCN 5.0
Code name TU104 Vega 10
Launch date 27 May 2019 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 35 9
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $999
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1545 MHz 1530 MHz
Core clock speed 1035 MHz 1200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 296.6 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 18.98 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 9.492 TFLOPS
Pipelines 3072
Pixel fill rate 98.88 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 296.6 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 110 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 13600 million 12,500 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Width IGP
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 16 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit
Memory type GDDR6
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz