NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1545 MHz vs 1050 MHz
1103.4x more texture fill rate: 296.6 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 275 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 14832 vs 10015
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19565 vs 8673
2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19565 vs 8673

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 24 June 2015
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Texture fill rate	296.6 GTexel/s vs 268.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt vs 275 Watt
Maximum memory size	16 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	14832 vs 10015
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19565 vs 8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19565 vs 8673

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

Around 33% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 3072
Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 843 vs 705
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 vs 3714
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 vs 3714

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	4096 vs 3072
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	843 vs 705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3361 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3361 vs 3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8925 vs 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8925 vs 3714

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

705

843

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

14832

10015

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19565

8673

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

19565

8673

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

3361

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

3361

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3714

8925

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3714

8925

Name	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
PassMark - G2D Mark	705	843
PassMark - G3D Mark	14832	10015
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	19565	8673
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	19565	8673
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346	3361
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346	3361
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3714	8925
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3714	8925
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0	5170
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		155.307
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		3431.249
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		12.49
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		153.089
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		857.575

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	GCN 3.0
Code name	TU104	Fiji
Launch date	27 May 2019	24 June 2015
Place in performance rating	175	218
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$649
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1545 MHz	1050 MHz
Core clock speed	1035 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	296.6 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	18.98 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	9.492 TFLOPS
Pipelines	3072	4096
Pixel fill rate	98.88 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	296.6 GTexel/s	268.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	110 Watt	275 Watt
Transistor count	13600 million	8,900 million
Compute units		64
Floating-point performance		8,602 gflops
Stream Processors		4096
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
Number of Eyefinity displays		6
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin
Width	IGP
Bridgeless CrossFire
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Length		191 mm
API support
DirectX	12.0	12
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Mantle
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	448 GB/s	512 GB/s
Memory bus width	256 bit	4096 Bit
Memory type	GDDR6	High Bandwidth Memory (HBM)
High bandwidth memory (HBM)
Memory clock speed		1050 MHz
Technologies
AMD Eyefinity
AppAcceleration
CrossFire
DDMA audio
FreeSync
FRTC
HD3D
LiquidVR
PowerTune
TressFX
TrueAudio
Unified Video Decoder (UVD)
Video Code Engine (VCE)
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)