NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M6
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 and NVIDIA Tesla M6 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.8x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19370 vs 6284
- 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 869 vs 371
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21578 vs 9390
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3290 vs 3260
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21578 vs 9390
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3290 vs 3260
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 30 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 vs 6284 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 vs 371 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 vs 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 vs 3260 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 3652
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 3652
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 3652 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 3652 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M6
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Tesla M6 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19370 | 6284 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 869 | 371 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 137262 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 401.574 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6432.348 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 43.914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 215.219 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2101.927 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21578 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3652 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3290 | 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21578 | 9390 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3652 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3290 | 3260 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | TU102 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 30 August 2015 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $9,999 | |
| Place in performance rating | 103 | 356 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 18,600 million | 5,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 1536 | |
| Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 with others
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIARTX A4000
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
IntelArc A580
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile 12GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 8000 vs
NVIDIAA30
