NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 795 / 1230 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 71% higher pipelines: 768 vs 448
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 40 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 441 vs 362
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6724 vs 3176
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33759 vs 11024
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 25 July 2011 |
Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 vs 448 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 vs 362 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6724 vs 3176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33759 vs 11024 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 3716
- Around 60% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 3716
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 3359
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 3359
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5962 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5962 vs 3716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9064 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9064 vs 3359 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 5962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 5962 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 9064 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 441 | 362 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6724 | 3176 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33759 | 11024 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.055 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 901.157 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.99 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.654 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 89.869 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Fermi |
Code name | N19P-Q1 | GF100 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 25 July 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 364 | 576 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | 575 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 448 |
Floating-point performance | 1,030.4 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 32.2 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 238 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,100 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Length | 248 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 144.0 GB / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI |