NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon RX 5500M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon RX 5500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- 716.4x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 144.76 GT/s
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3703 vs 3617
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3703 vs 3617
- Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41349 vs 38654
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 336
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6923 vs 3166
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s vs 144.76 GT/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 vs 3617 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 vs 3617 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3345 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41349 vs 38654 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 vs 336 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6923 vs 3166 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 1448 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1645 MHz vs 1620 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11058 vs 7682
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11058 vs 7682
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 7 Oct 2019 vs 27 May 2019 |
| Core clock speed | 1448 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz vs 1620 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11058 vs 7682 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11058 vs 7682 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5500M
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 | 11058 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 | 11058 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 | 3617 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 | 3617 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3345 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41349 | 38654 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 | 336 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6923 | 3166 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4223 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon RX 5500M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA |
| Code name | TU117 | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 7 Oct 2019 |
| Place in performance rating | 381 | 390 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1645 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1448 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) | 9.26 TFLOPs |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.318 TFLOPS | 4.63 TFLOPs |
| Pipelines | 1024 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 51.84 GPixel/s | 52.6 GP/s |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s | 144.76 GT/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 6400 million |
| Compute units | 22 | |
| Stream Processors | 1408 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1 x 8-pin |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X1900 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon HD 2900 PRO
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 280X
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300M
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Max-Q vs
IntelArc A370M
