NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1076 MHz
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1480 MHz
• 1094.8x more texture fill rate: 103.7 GTexel/s vs 94.72 GTexel / s
• Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3703 vs 3681
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3703 vs 3681
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3316
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3316
• Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 41323 vs 22533

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P2000

• Around 25% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 4 GB
• 3.5x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective)
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10251 vs 7682
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10251 vs 7682
• Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 644 vs 430

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P2000

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7682 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7682 10251
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3703 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3703 3681
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3316
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3316
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	41323 22533
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	430 644
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	6923 6934

Compare specifications (specs)