NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
Around 98% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 797 MHz
Around 98% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 902 MHz
527.5x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
3.8x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 225 Watt
Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 24016

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 23 July 2013
Core clock speed	1575 MHz vs 797 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz vs 902 MHz
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s vs 216.5 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 225 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863 vs 24016

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K6000

2.8x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1024
3x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 4 GB
Around 11% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8085 vs 7255
Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 552 vs 432
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12657 vs 9313
Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12657 vs 9313

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	2880 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	12 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	8085 vs 7255
PassMark - G2D Mark	552 vs 432
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12657 vs 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3711 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12657 vs 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3711 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7255

8085

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

432

552

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

38863

24016

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

12657

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3711

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3356

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

12657

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3711

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3356

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro K6000
PassMark - G3D Mark	7255	8085
PassMark - G2D Mark	432	552
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863	24016
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313	12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698	3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313	12657
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698	3711
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3356
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		67.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1816.61
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		7.435
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		88.889
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		355.166

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Kepler
Code name	TU117	GK110B
Launch date	27 May 2019	23 July 2013
Place in performance rating	365	368
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$5,265
Price now		$833.98
Value for money (0-100)		11.34
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	902 MHz
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	797 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	2880
Pixel fill rate	57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s	216.5 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	7,080 million
Floating-point performance		5,196 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		267 mm
Supplementary power connectors		2x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	288.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	6008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5