NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- 5.3x more core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 50% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1190 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
- 3.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 2400 MHz
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7255 vs 4809
- Around 73% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 22421
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 8870
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 3586
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 8870
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 3586
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 14 November 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1190 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 2400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7255 vs 4809 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 vs 22421 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 vs 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 vs 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 vs 3586 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
- Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 585 vs 432
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 585 vs 432 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7255 | 4809 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 432 | 585 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 22421 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 8870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3586 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | TU117 | Vega 12 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 14 November 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 365 | 366 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1190 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 300 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | |
Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 2400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 |