NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1392 MHz
  • Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1392 MHz
  • 1709.1x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 768
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
  • 1142.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
  • Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7235 vs 6332
  • Around 87% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 20732
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9313 vs 8496
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3336
  • Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9313 vs 8496
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3336
  • 10.9x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 305
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 25 October 2016
Core clock speed 1575 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Boost clock speed 1785 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Texture fill rate 114.2 GTexel/s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1024 vs 768
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 7235 vs 6332
Geekbench - OpenCL 38863 vs 20732
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9313 vs 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 vs 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9313 vs 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 vs 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3319 vs 305

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 430
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 650 vs 430

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
7235
6332
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
430
650
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
38863
20732
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9313
8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9313
8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3698
3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3353
3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
3319
305
Name NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark 7235 6332
PassMark - G2D Mark 430 650
Geekbench - OpenCL 38863 20732
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9313 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3698 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3353 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9313 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3698 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3353 3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 3319 305
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU117 GP107
Launch date 27 May 2019 25 October 2016
Place in performance rating 362 487
Type Mobile workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $139
Price now $159.99
Value for money (0-100) 46.07

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1785 MHz 1392 MHz
Core clock speed 1575 MHz 1392 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines 1024 768
Pixel fill rate 57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 114.2 GTexel/s 66.82 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 60 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 3,300 million
CUDA cores 768
Floating-point performance 2,138 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 97 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 145 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 128.0 GB/s 112 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 7 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready