NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1140 MHz
- Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 452 vs 364
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 23 April 2019 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1140 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 452 vs 364 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8622 vs 7153
- Around 39% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53834 vs 38863
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 9313
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3698
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 9313
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3698
- Around 48% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4912 vs 3319
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 128.2 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8622 vs 7153 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53834 vs 38863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12301 vs 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12301 vs 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4912 vs 3319 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7153 | 8622 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 452 | 364 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 53834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 12301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 12301 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 | 4912 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 195.93 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1919.95 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 14.6 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 94.964 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 492.867 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU117 | TU116 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 23 April 2019 |
Place in performance rating | 368 | 333 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1335 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1140 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | 128.2 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | 8.202 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | 4.101 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1536 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | 64.08 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s | 128.2 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 60 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 6600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 288.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |