NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
• Around 38% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1140 MHz
• Around 34% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1335 MHz
• 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12000 MHz effective)
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 430 vs 360

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

• Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 128.2 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1024
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 19% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8609 vs 7235
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 52263 vs 38863
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12301 vs 9313
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3698
• Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12301 vs 9313
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3698
• Around 48% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4903 vs 3319

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7235 8609
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	430 360
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	38863 52263
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9313 12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9313 12301
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3698 3718
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3353 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3319 4903

Compare specifications (specs)