NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA P106-100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA P106-100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA P106-100

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1506 MHz
Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1709 MHz
835.4x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
2x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 120 Watt
Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7160 vs 6357
Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 452 vs 255
Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 34712
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3698 vs 1860
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 1680
Around 99% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3698 vs 1860
2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 1680

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 19 June 2017
Core clock speed	1575 MHz vs 1506 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz vs 1709 MHz
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 120 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	7160 vs 6357
PassMark - G2D Mark	452 vs 255
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863 vs 34712
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698 vs 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353 vs 1680
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698 vs 1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353 vs 1680

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA P106-100

Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12824 vs 9313
Around 38% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12824 vs 9313
Around 22% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 4061 vs 3319

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1280 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	6 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	8008 MHz vs 8000 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	12824 vs 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	12824 vs 9313
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	4061 vs 3319

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA P106-100

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7160

6357

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

452

255

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

38863

34712

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

12824

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

1860

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

1680

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

12824

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

1860

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

1680

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3319

4061

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA P106-100
PassMark - G3D Mark	7160	6357
PassMark - G2D Mark	452	255
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863	34712
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313	12824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698	1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	1680
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313	12824
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698	1860
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	1680
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319	4061
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		163.993
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1705.321
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		9.266
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		76.32
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		448.036

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA P106-100
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	TU117	GP106
Launch date	27 May 2019	19 June 2017
Place in performance rating	368	425
Type	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	1709 MHz
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	1506 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	1280
Pixel fill rate	57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s	136.7 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	120 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	4,400 million
Floating-point performance		4,375 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		250 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	192.2 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	8008 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5