NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P3000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1088 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz
- Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7139 vs 6636
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 451 vs 444
- Around 55% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38863 vs 25146
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 11 January 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1088 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 7008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7139 vs 6636 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 451 vs 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 vs 25146 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P3000
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 1024
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9579 vs 9313
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 3698
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9579 vs 9313
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 3698
- Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3489 vs 3319
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9579 vs 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 vs 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9579 vs 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 vs 3353 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3489 vs 3319 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P3000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7139 | 6636 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 451 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 25146 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 9579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 9579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 | 3489 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro P3000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU117 | N17E-Q1 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 11 January 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 368 | 382 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1088 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 1024 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 168 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Stereo | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |