NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro P4000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 31% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1202 MHz
Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1480 MHz
688.8x more texture fill rate: 114.2 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 100 Watt
Around 5% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7604 MHz
3x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 1115

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	27 May 2019 vs 6 February 2017
Core clock speed	1575 MHz vs 1202 MHz
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz vs 1480 MHz
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 100 Watt
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz vs 7604 MHz
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319 vs 1115

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000

Around 75% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1024
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11545 vs 7235
Around 85% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 vs 430
Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 42289 vs 38863
Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15267 vs 9313
Around 64% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15267 vs 9313

Specifications (specs)
Pipelines	1792 vs 1024
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	11545 vs 7235
PassMark - G2D Mark	795 vs 430
Geekbench - OpenCL	42289 vs 38863
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	15267 vs 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3714 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3353
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	15267 vs 9313
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3714 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3353

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

7235

11545

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

430

795

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

38863

42289

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

15267

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

9313

15267

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3698

3714

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3353

3358

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

3319

1115

Name	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro P4000
PassMark - G3D Mark	7235	11545
PassMark - G2D Mark	430	795
Geekbench - OpenCL	38863	42289
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	9313	15267
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3698	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3353	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	9313	15267
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3698	3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3353	3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	3319	1115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		152.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1590.392
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		11.365
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		45.977
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		751.626

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile	NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Essentials
Architecture	Turing	Pascal
Code name	TU117	GP104
Launch date	27 May 2019	6 February 2017
Place in performance rating	362	287
Type	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$815
Price now		$799.99
Value for money (0-100)		17.17
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1785 MHz	1480 MHz
Core clock speed	1575 MHz	1202 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	114.2 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	7.311 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	3.656 TFLOPS
Pipelines	1024	1792
Pixel fill rate	57.12 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	114.2 GTexel/s	165.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt	100 Watt
Transistor count	4700 million	7,200 million
Floating-point performance		5,304 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort
Display Port		1.4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length		241 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	128.0 GB/s	192 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	7604 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Stereo
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus