NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 month(s) later
- Around 57% higher core clock speed: 1575 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1785 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 4.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Around 77% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 vs 1873
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 13 November 2018 |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 vs 1873 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Around 95% higher texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s
- 2.3x more pipelines: 2304 vs 1024
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 vs 38863
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 9313
- 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 9313
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 114.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2304 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 vs 38863 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 9313 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3698 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3353 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7235 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 85209 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 20206 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 | 1873 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU117 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 13 November 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 362 | 211 |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1575 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | 222.5 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | 14.24 TFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 114.2 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 13600 million |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro K6000
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-8Q
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 480
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATitan X Pascal
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 580 (Laptop)
NVIDIAQuadro T2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580X
