NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile versus NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 57% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1575 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1785 MHz versus 1545 MHz
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 60 Watt versus 160 Watt
- 4.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 8000 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Environ 77% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3319 versus 1873
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 versus 13 November 2018 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz versus 1545 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt versus 160 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 versus 1873 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Environ 95% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 222.5 GTexel/s versus 114.2 GTexel/s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 1024
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- 2.2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 versus 38863
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 9313
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 9313
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s versus 114.2 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 1024 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 versus 38863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3353 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 9313 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3698 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3353 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7235 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 430 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38863 | 85209 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9313 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3698 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9313 | 20206 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3698 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3319 | 1873 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Nom de code | TU117 | TU104 |
Date de sortie | 27 May 2019 | 13 November 2018 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 362 | 211 |
Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | 1545 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1575 MHz | 1005 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 114.2 GFLOPS | 222.5 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.311 TFLOPS | 14.24 TFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.656 TFLOPS | 7.119 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2304 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.12 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 114.2 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 60 Watt | 160 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 13600 million |
Render output units | 64 | |
Texture Units | 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 128.0 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 8000 MHz | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |