NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
- Around 62% higher boost clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1545 MHz
- 6.7x more pipelines: 15360 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
- Around 83% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 155595 vs 85209
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1545 MHz |
| Pipelines | 15360 vs 2304 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 8 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 155595 vs 85209 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1005 MHz vs 915 MHz
- 185.1x more texture fill rate: 222.5 GTexel/s vs 1,202 GTexel/s
- Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 160 Watt vs 300 Watt
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 222.5 GTexel/s vs 1,202 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 23871 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 155595 | 85209 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Code name | AD102 | TU104 |
| Place in performance rating | 41 | 211 |
| GCN generation | Quadro RTX | |
| Launch date | 13 November 2018 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 15360 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 440.9 GPixel/s | 98.88 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 1,202 GTexel/s | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 160 Watt |
| Transistor count | 76300 million | 13600 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 9.5 inches (241 mm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 960.0 GB/s | 416.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation with others
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900M
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
