NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA RTX A5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 2505 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Around 88% higher pipelines: 15360 vs 8192
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 24 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23871 vs 22553
- Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 155595 vs 154729
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Pipelines | 15360 vs 8192 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 24 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 23871 vs 22553 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 155595 vs 154729 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Around 28% higher core clock speed: 1170 MHz vs 915 MHz
- 361x more texture fill rate: 433.9 GTexel/s vs 1,202 GTexel/s
- Around 30% lower typical power consumption: 230 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1032 vs 747
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1170 MHz vs 915 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 433.9 GTexel/s vs 1,202 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1032 vs 747 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A5000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX A5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 | 1032 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 23871 | 22553 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 155595 | 154729 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD102 | GA102 |
| Place in performance rating | 41 | 69 |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2505 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 915 MHz | 1170 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Pipelines | 15360 | 8192 |
| Pixel fill rate | 440.9 GPixel/s | 162.7 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 1,202 GTexel/s | 433.9 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Transistor count | 76300 million | 28300 million |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm, 10.5 inches | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 700 Watt | 550 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Width | 112 mm, 4.4 inches | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 960.0 GB/s | 768 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 384 bit | 384 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2500 MHz, 20 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation with others
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation 16GB
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900M
NVIDIARTX 5000 Ada Generation vs
AMDRadeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
