NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 29% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- 4.2x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 400 Watt
- Around 23% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective)
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 400 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1095 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 4.2x more texture fill rate: 609.1 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 6912 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 8 nm
- 10x more maximum memory size: 40 GB vs 4 GB
- 3.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 200738 vs 56688
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 21006 vs 12750
- 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 27823 vs 3708
- 15.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 51880 vs 3355
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 21006 vs 12750
- 7.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 27823 vs 3708
- 15.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 51880 vs 3355
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1095 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 609.1 GTexel/s vs 145.2 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 6912 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 8 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 40 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 200738 vs 56688 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 21006 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 27823 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 51880 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 21006 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 27823 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 51880 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56688 | 200738 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 21006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 27823 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 51880 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 21006 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 27823 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 51880 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Code name | GA106 | GA100 |
| Place in performance rating | 272 | 7 |
| Launch date | 14 May 2020 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | 9.746 TFLOPS (1:2) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | 77.97 TFLOPS (4:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | 19.49 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 6912 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | 225.6 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 609.1 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 400 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 54200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 800 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 40 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 1555 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 5120 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1215 MHz (2.4 Gbps effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | HBM2e |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
