NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- 2469.4x more texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 58.8 GTexel / s
- 2.9x more pipelines: 2560 vs 896
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 vs 4551
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 vs 4551
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 896 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 vs 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 vs 4551 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
- Around 43% higher core clock speed: 1050 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 12% lower typical power consumption: 85 Watt vs 95 Watt
- 4x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6886 vs 3708
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17482 vs 3355
- Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6886 vs 3708
- 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17482 vs 3355
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1050 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 85 Watt vs 95 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 6000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6886 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 17482 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 6886 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 17482 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9865 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 489 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56685 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 17482 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 4551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 6886 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 17482 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | AMD Radeon HD 8770 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
| Code name | GA106 | Bonaire |
| Place in performance rating | 275 | 277 |
| Launch date | 2 September 2013 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 896 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 58.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 85 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 2,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 1,882 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 183 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 96 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 6000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon 550
