NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1670 MHz
- 1086.8x more texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 vs 12021
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 vs 12021
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1670 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 133.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1280 |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 vs 12021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 vs 12021 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
- Around 91% higher core clock speed: 1404 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 19% lower typical power consumption: 80 Watt vs 95 Watt
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5569 vs 3708
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 5034 vs 3355
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5569 vs 3708
- Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 5034 vs 3355
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1404 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt vs 95 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5569 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 5034 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5569 vs 3708 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 5034 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 9934 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 481 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 56817 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 12021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 5569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 5034 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 12021 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 5569 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 5034 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
Code name | GA106 | GP106 |
Place in performance rating | 282 | 283 |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1670 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1404 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1280 |
Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 133.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 80 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | 4,400 million |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
CUDA |