NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1771 MHz
- 512.4x more texture fill rate: 145.2 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 89% lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 180 Watt
- 150x more memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 10 GB/s
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56602 vs 55407
- Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 150.103
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 vs 2036.763
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 vs 14.035
- 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 27.417
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1771 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s vs 283.4 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt vs 180 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 10 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56602 vs 55407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 vs 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 vs 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 vs 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 vs 27.417 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1607 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 819.934 vs 729.947
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20151 vs 12750
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 4646 vs 3708
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4195 vs 3355
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20151 vs 12750
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 4646 vs 3708
- Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4195 vs 3355
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 819.934 vs 729.947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20151 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 4646 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4195 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20151 vs 12750 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 4646 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4195 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9903 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56602 | 55407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 150.103 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 2036.763 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 14.035 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 27.417 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 819.934 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 4195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 20151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 4646 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 4195 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7222 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Code name | GA106 | GP104 |
| Place in performance rating | 274 | 275 |
| Launch date | 15 August 2016 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499.99 | |
| Price now | $439.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 43.70 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1771 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | 283.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 180 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Floating-point performance | 9,068 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 320 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 10 GB/s |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Laptop)
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P4000
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
