NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9765 vs 7881
- Around 45% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 56688 vs 39165
- Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 202.984 vs 134.765
- Around 62% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2138.158 vs 1316.075
- Around 87% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 16.498 vs 8.799
- Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 151.433 vs 94.915
- Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 729.947 vs 573.418
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12750 vs 10959
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12750 vs 10959
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 vs 7881 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56688 vs 39165 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 vs 134.765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 vs 1316.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 vs 8.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 vs 94.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 vs 573.418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 vs 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 vs 10959 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- 2x more core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 5.3x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 564 vs 493
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 564 vs 493 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3708 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3355 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9765 | 7881 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 493 | 564 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56688 | 39165 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 202.984 | 134.765 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2138.158 | 1316.075 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 16.498 | 8.799 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 151.433 | 94.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 729.947 | 573.418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12750 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12750 | 10959 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 305 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA106 | TU107 |
| Place in performance rating | 272 | 376 |
| Launch date | 30 April 2019 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1665 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1485 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 145.2 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.293 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2560 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 87.12 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 145.2 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 1 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| HDMI | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 8000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
ATIRadeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon R9 390X
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla T4
NVIDIARTX A2000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT400 4GB
