NVIDIA T400 versus NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA T400
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 ans 2 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 34.20 GTexel/s versus 51.84 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 80 Watt
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16982 versus 6673
- 3.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 versus 18.462
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.059 versus 427.88
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 versus 1.899
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 versus 23.742
- 3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 versus 61.965
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 versus 3798
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 versus 3321
- Environ 34% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 versus 3798
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 versus 3321
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 versus 1 March 2013 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s versus 51.84 GTexel / s |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 80 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16982 versus 6673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 versus 18.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 versus 427.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 versus 1.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 versus 23.742 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 versus 61.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 versus 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 versus 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 versus 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 versus 3321 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4000
- Environ 93% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 810 MHz versus 420 MHz
- 2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- 4.5x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5616 MHz versus 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 versus 2173
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 versus 2173
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz versus 420 MHz |
Pipelines | 768 versus 384 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 5616 MHz versus 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3651 versus 2173 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3651 versus 2173 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16982 | 6673 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | 18.462 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | 427.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | 1.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | 23.742 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | 61.965 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3321 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | 3798 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | 3651 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3321 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2723 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 421 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 817 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA T400 | NVIDIA Quadro K4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
Nom de code | TU117 | GK106 |
Date de sortie | 6 May 2021 | 1 March 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 887 | 890 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,269 | |
Prix maintenant | $225.65 | |
Genre | Workstation | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.81 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 420 MHz | 810 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 768 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 34.20 GTexel/s | 51.84 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 80 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 2,540 million |
Performance á point flottant | 1,244 gflops | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 1x 6-pin |
Longeur | 241 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.00 GB/s | 134.8 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 bit | 192 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | 5616 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |