NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs ATI Radeon HD 4810

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2050 and ATI Radeon HD 4810 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
  • Around 61% higher texture fill rate: 32.2 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
  • Around 29% better floating-point performance: 1,030.4 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
  • 6x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 512 MB
  • 4.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3176 vs 769
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 25 July 2011 vs 28 May 2009
Texture fill rate 32.2 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance 1,030.4 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm vs 55 nm
Maximum memory size 3 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3176 vs 769

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4810

  • Around 9% higher core clock speed: 625 MHz vs 575 MHz
  • Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
  • 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 95 Watt vs 238 Watt
  • Around 20% higher memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 3000 MHz
  • Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 425 vs 362
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 625 MHz vs 575 MHz
Pipelines 640 vs 448
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 95 Watt vs 238 Watt
Memory clock speed 3600 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 425 vs 362

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4810

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3176
769
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
362
425
Name NVIDIA Tesla C2050 ATI Radeon HD 4810
PassMark - G3D Mark 3176 769
PassMark - G2D Mark 362 425
Geekbench - OpenCL 11024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 26.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 901.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 41.654
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 89.869
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 9064

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 ATI Radeon HD 4810

Essentials

Architecture Fermi TeraScale
Code name GF100 RV770
Launch date 25 July 2011 28 May 2009
Place in performance rating 576 339
Type Workstation Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 575 MHz 625 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,030.4 gflops 800.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 448 640
Texture fill rate 32.2 GTexel / s 20 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 238 Watt 95 Watt
Transistor count 3,100 million 956 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors 1x DVI 2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 248 mm 246 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.1
OpenGL 4.6 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 144.0 GB / s 57.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 384 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 3000 MHz 3600 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5