NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• 2.2x more core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 575 MHz
• Around 81% higher texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
• Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
• Around 81% better floating-point performance: 1,862 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 238 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
• 2.3x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 3000 MHz
• Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5034 vs 3176
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 461 vs 362
• Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17485 vs 11024
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 26.055
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 2.99
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 89.869

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050

• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 901.157 vs 799.414
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.654 vs 30.523
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 3685
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 3360
• Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 3685
• 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 3360

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5034 3176
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	461 362
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	17485 11024
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.209 26.055
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	799.414 901.157
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.536 2.99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.523 41.654
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	223.683 89.869
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3685 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 9064
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3685 5962
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3360 9064

Compare specifications (specs)