NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and NVIDIA Tesla C2050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 575 MHz
- Around 81% higher texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
- Around 43% higher pipelines: 640 vs 448
- Around 81% better floating-point performance: 1,862 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 238 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- 2.3x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5048 vs 3176
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 464 vs 362
- Around 52% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16801 vs 11024
- 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 26.055
- Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 2.99
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 89.869
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 25 July 2011 |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 575 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s vs 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 448 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops vs 1,030.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 238 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5048 vs 3176 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 464 vs 362 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16801 vs 11024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 vs 26.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 vs 2.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 vs 89.869 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2050
- Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 901.157 vs 799.414
- Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.654 vs 30.523
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5962 vs 3685
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 9064 vs 3360
- Around 62% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5962 vs 3685
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 9064 vs 3360
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 901.157 vs 799.414 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.654 vs 30.523 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5962 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 9064 vs 3360 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5962 vs 3685 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 9064 vs 3360 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2050
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5048 | 3176 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 464 | 362 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16801 | 11024 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | 26.055 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | 901.157 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | 2.99 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | 41.654 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | 89.869 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 5962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | 9064 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 5962 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | 9064 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1755 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Tesla C2050 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Fermi |
| Code name | GP107 | GF100 |
| Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 25 July 2011 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Place in performance rating | 579 | 576 |
| Price now | $124.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 575 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 448 |
| Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s | 32.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 1x DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | 248 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 144.0 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
ATIRadeon 2100 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIATesla C2050
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon HD 8530M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIANVS 810
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M2000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P620
