NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075

2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 1306
Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.973 vs 24.784
Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.623 vs 917.512
Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.142 vs 3.125
Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.924 vs 44.227

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	575 MHz vs 574 MHz
Texture fill rate	32.2 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,030.4 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3017 vs 1306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.973 vs 24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	930.623 vs 917.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.142 vs 3.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	45.924 vs 44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	93.747 vs 93.533

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

Around 10% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 247 Watt
Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 3132 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 428

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	225 Watt vs 247 Watt
Memory clock speed	3132 MHz vs 3000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	444 vs 428

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3017

1306

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

428

444

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26.973

24.784

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

930.623

917.512

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.142

3.125

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

45.924

44.227

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

93.747

93.533

Name	NVIDIA Tesla C2075	NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark	3017	1306
PassMark - G2D Mark	428	444
Geekbench - OpenCL	10493
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.973	24.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	930.623	917.512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.142	3.125
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	45.924	44.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	93.747	93.533
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3705
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla C2075	NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Fermi
Code name	GF110	GF100
Launch date	25 July 2011	25 July 2011
Place in performance rating	788	789
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$5,489
Technical info
Core clock speed	575 MHz	574 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,030.4 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	448	448
Texture fill rate	32.2 GTexel / s	32.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	247 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	248 mm	248 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	144.0 GB / s	150.3 GB / s
Memory bus width	384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz	3132 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5