NVIDIA Tesla C2075 versus NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla C2075
- 2.3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 versus 1306
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.973 versus 24.784
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.623 versus 917.512
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.142 versus 3.125
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.924 versus 44.227
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz versus 574 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.2 GTexel / s versus 32.1 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 1,030.4 gflops versus 1,027.7 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 versus 1306 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.973 versus 24.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.623 versus 917.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.142 versus 3.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.924 versus 44.227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.747 versus 93.533 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 247 Watt
- Environ 4% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 3132 MHz versus 3000 MHz
- Environ 4% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 versus 428
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 247 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3132 MHz versus 3000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 versus 428 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 | 1306 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 | 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10493 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.973 | 24.784 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.623 | 917.512 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.142 | 3.125 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.924 | 44.227 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.747 | 93.533 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2825 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | NVIDIA Tesla M2070-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
Nom de code | GF110 | GF100 |
Date de sortie | 25 July 2011 | 25 July 2011 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 787 | 788 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $5,489 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 575 MHz | 574 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 1,030.4 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 448 | 448 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32.2 GTexel / s | 32.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 247 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 248 mm | 248 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 6 GB | 6 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 144.0 GB / s | 150.3 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3000 MHz | 3132 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |