NVIDIA Tesla K10 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K10 and NVIDIA Quadro 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K10
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 513 MHz
- 13.1x more texture fill rate: 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 22.57 GTexel / s
- 8.7x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 352
- 6.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 2,289 gflops vs 722.3 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.2x more maximum memory size: 2x 4 GB vs 2560 MB
- Around 67% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz
- Around 91% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14029 vs 7358
- 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 40.736 vs 16.451
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 975.508 vs 511.131
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.39 vs 1.925
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3632 vs 3104
- Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3632 vs 3104
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3353 vs 3316
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3353 vs 3316
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 May 2012 vs 23 February 2011 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 513 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 22.57 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 vs 352 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,289 gflops vs 722.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2x 4 GB vs 2560 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 3000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14029 vs 7358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.736 vs 16.451 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 975.508 vs 511.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.39 vs 1.925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3632 vs 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3632 vs 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3316 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 5000
- Around 48% lower typical power consumption: 152 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 152 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K10
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K10 | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 14029 | 7358 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 40.736 | 16.451 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 975.508 | 511.131 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.39 | 1.925 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3632 | 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3632 | 3104 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3316 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3316 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1934 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 388 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.065 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 46.591 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2602 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2602 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K10 | NVIDIA Quadro 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK104 | GF100 |
Launch date | 1 May 2012 | 23 February 2011 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $5,099 | $2,499 |
Place in performance rating | 978 | 981 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Price now | $268 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 513 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 2,289 gflops | 722.3 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 1536 | 352 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 95.36 GTexel / s billion / sec | 22.57 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 152 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 3,100 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 272 mm | 248 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 4 GB | 2560 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 160.0 GB / s | 120.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 256 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 3000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |