NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 4.8x more texture fill rate: 164.0 GTexel / s vs 34.0 billion / sec
- 6x more pipelines: 2688 vs 448
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.8x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1280 MB
- 3.1x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate)
- Around 51% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16581 vs 10961
- Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.455 vs 27.93
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1666.354 vs 980.005
- Around 79% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.836 vs 3.268
- Around 95% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 92.472 vs 47.309
- 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 275.229 vs 97.852
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 vs 3317
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 vs 3317
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 November 2012 vs 26 March 2010 |
Texture fill rate | 164.0 GTexel / s vs 34.0 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 2688 vs 448 |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops vs 1,088.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1280 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16581 vs 10961 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 vs 27.93 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 vs 980.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 vs 3.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 vs 47.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 vs 97.852 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 vs 3317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 vs 3317 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
- Around 66% higher core clock speed: 1215 MHz vs 732 MHz
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 215 Watt vs 235 Watt
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3107 vs 2918
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 406 vs 172
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3614 vs 1032
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3614 vs 1032
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz vs 732 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 235 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3107 vs 2918 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 406 vs 172 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3614 vs 1032 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3614 vs 1032 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2918 | 3107 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | 406 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16581 | 10961 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 | 27.93 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 | 980.005 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 | 3.268 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 | 47.309 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 | 97.852 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1032 | 3614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 | 3317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1032 | 3614 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 | 3317 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3873 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3873 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | GK110 | GF100 |
Launch date | 12 November 2012 | 26 March 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | $349 |
Place in performance rating | 808 | 810 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Price now | $522.01 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 6.87 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 732 MHz | 1215 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | 1,088.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 2688 | 448 |
Texture fill rate | 164.0 GTexel / s | 34.0 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt | 215 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 3,100 million |
CUDA cores | 448 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Two Dual Link DVIMini HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 9.5" (241 mm) (24.1 cm) |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pins | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1280 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 249.6 GB / s | 133.9 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1674 MHz (3348 data rate) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI | ||
Surround |