NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 60% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 164.0 GTexel / s versus 102.5 billion / sec
- 2x plus de pipelines: 2688 versus 1344
- Environ 60% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,935 gflops versus 2,459.5 gflops
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 6 GB versus 2 GB
- 866.7x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5200 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 16664 versus 15347
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 49.455 versus 36.256
- Environ 62% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1666.354 versus 1029.267
- Environ 92% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.836 versus 3.037
- 2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 92.472 versus 45.894
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 275.229 versus 82.191
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7038 versus 3337
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7038 versus 3337
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 November 2012 versus 16 August 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 164.0 GTexel / s versus 102.5 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2688 versus 1344 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,935 gflops versus 2,459.5 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 6 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5200 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16664 versus 15347 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 versus 36.256 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 versus 1029.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 versus 3.037 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 versus 45.894 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 versus 82.191 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 versus 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 versus 3337 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- Environ 25% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 915 MHz versus 732 MHz
- Environ 57% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 150 Watt versus 235 Watt
- 2.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 466 versus 198
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3684 versus 1032
- 3.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3684 versus 1032
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 915 MHz versus 732 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt versus 235 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4423 versus 4403 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 466 versus 198 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3684 versus 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3684 versus 1032 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4403 | 4423 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 | 466 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16664 | 15347 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.455 | 36.256 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 | 1029.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.836 | 3.037 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 | 45.894 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 | 82.191 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1032 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 | 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1032 | 3684 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 | 3337 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3285 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3285 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1616 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GK110 | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 12 November 2012 | 16 August 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $7,699 | $299 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 746 | 747 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $321.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 17.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 732 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,935 gflops | 2,459.5 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2688 | 1344 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 164.0 GTexel / s | 102.5 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 235 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 7,080 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1344 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Options SLI | 3-way | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | Two 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 249.6 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5200 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm avec des autres
NVIDIATesla K20Xm vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 480
NVIDIATesla K20Xm vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 690
NVIDIATesla K20Xm vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 660 Ti
NVIDIATesla K20Xm vs
IntelHD Graphics 5600
NVIDIATesla K20Xm vs
AMDFirePro S7100X
NVIDIATesla K20Xm vs
AMDRadeon RX 560D
