NVIDIA Tesla K80m vs AMD FirePro M4100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80m and AMD FirePro M4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 135.7x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 16.08 GTexel / s
- 13x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 384
- 17x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 514.6 gflops
- 12x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 25% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17090 vs 5067
- 4.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 64.435 vs 15.905
- 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1476.444 vs 432.116
- 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 75.764 vs 24.029
- 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 198.978 vs 74.162
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.289 vs 1.48
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 17 November 2014 vs 16 October 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 16.08 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2x 2496 vs 384 |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,373 gflops vs 514.6 gflops |
Maximum memory size | 2x 12 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17090 vs 5067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.435 vs 15.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1476.444 vs 432.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.764 vs 24.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 198.978 vs 74.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.289 vs 1.48 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M4100
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 670 MHz vs 562 MHz
Core clock speed | 670 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M4100
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K80m | AMD FirePro M4100 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17090 | 5067 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.435 | 15.905 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1476.444 | 432.116 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 75.764 | 24.029 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 198.978 | 74.162 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.289 | 1.48 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1059 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 623 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3591 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3361 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3591 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3361 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K80m | AMD FirePro M4100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK210 | Mars |
Launch date | 17 November 2014 | 16 October 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 805 | 800 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 876 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 670 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2x 4,373 gflops | 514.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2x 2496 | 384 |
Texture fill rate | 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec | 16.08 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 300 Watt | |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2x 12 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 2x 240.6 GB / s | 64 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 2x 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AppAcceleration |