NVIDIA Tesla M6 vs AMD FirePro W8100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla M6 and AMD FirePro W8100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla M6
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 824 MHz
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 220 Watt
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9390 vs 5494
- Around 71% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9390 vs 5494
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 23 June 2014 |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz vs 824 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9390 vs 5494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9390 vs 5494 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8100
- Around 16% higher texture fill rate: 131.8 GTexel / s vs 113.3 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 2560 vs 1536
- Around 16% better floating-point performance: 4,219 gflops vs 3,625 gflops
- Around 93% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 717 vs 371
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7279 vs 6284
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3349 vs 3260
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3349 vs 3260
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 GTexel / s vs 113.3 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1536 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops vs 3,625 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 717 vs 371 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7279 vs 6284 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 3683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3260 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla M6
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8100
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla M6 | AMD FirePro W8100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 | 717 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6284 | 7279 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9390 | 5494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9390 | 5494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3260 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3260 | 3349 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34705 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.339 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2333.922 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.816 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.45 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 440.107 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla M6 | AMD FirePro W8100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Hawaii |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 23 June 2014 |
Place in performance rating | 357 | 386 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 824 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 3,625 gflops | 4,219 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 2560 |
Texture fill rate | 113.3 GTexel / s | 131.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 220 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 6,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 279 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |