NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
- Around 5% higher core clock speed: 1481 MHz vs 1417 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1582 MHz vs 1531 MHz
- Around 3% higher texture fill rate: 354.4 GTexel / s vs 342.9 GTexel / s
- Around 3% better floating-point performance: 11,340 gflops vs 10,974 gflops
- Around 10% higher memory clock speed: 11008 MHz vs 10008 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.837 vs 165.792
- Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2406.499 vs 2368.267
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 vs 17.829
- Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.833 vs 21.354
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1002.573 vs 992.132
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 vs 10841
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3696
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 3333
- Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 vs 10841
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3696
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 3333
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 March 2017 vs 2 August 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1481 MHz vs 1417 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz vs 1531 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 354.4 GTexel / s vs 342.9 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops vs 10,974 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz vs 10008 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 vs 67348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 vs 165.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 vs 2368.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 vs 17.829 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 vs 21.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 vs 992.132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 vs 10841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 vs 10841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 3333 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- Around 9% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 11 GB
- Around 1% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2243 vs 2231
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 11 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2243 vs 2231 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 | 67348 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | 165.792 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | 2368.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | 17.829 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | 21.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | 992.132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 | 10841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 | 10841 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3696 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3333 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2231 | 2243 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Code name | GP102 | GP102 |
| Launch date | 10 March 2017 | 2 August 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $699 | $1,199 |
| Place in performance rating | 219 | 359 |
| Price now | $826.98 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1582 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1481 MHz | 1417 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 11,340 gflops | 10,974 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 91 °C | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | 3584 |
| Texture fill rate | 354.4 GTexel / s | 342.9 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Transistor count | 11,800 million | 11,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 11 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 484.4 GB / s | 480.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 352 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 11008 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5X | GDDR5X |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| PCIe 3.0 | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGRID M6-8Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIATesla V100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) vs
AMDRadeon RX 6500 XT
