NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) versus NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA Titan X Pascal pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 7 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1481 MHz versus 1417 MHz
- Environ 3% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1582 MHz versus 1531 MHz
- Environ 3% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 354.4 GTexel / s versus 342.9 GTexel / s
- Environ 3% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 11,340 gflops versus 10,974 gflops
- Environ 10% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 11008 MHz versus 10008 MHz
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 205.837 versus 165.792
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2406.499 versus 2368.267
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 19.591 versus 17.829
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.833 versus 21.354
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1002.573 versus 992.132
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 15019 versus 10841
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3696
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 3333
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 15019 versus 10841
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3696
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 3333
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 10 March 2017 versus 2 August 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1481 MHz versus 1417 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz versus 1531 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 354.4 GTexel / s versus 342.9 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 11,340 gflops versus 10,974 gflops |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11008 MHz versus 10008 MHz |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 versus 67348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 versus 165.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 versus 2368.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 versus 17.829 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 versus 21.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 versus 992.132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 versus 10841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 versus 10841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3333 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
- Environ 9% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 12 GB versus 11 GB
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2243 versus 2231
Caractéristiques | |
Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 11 GB |
Référence | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2243 versus 2231 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Titan X Pascal
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18598 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 937 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 67670 | 67348 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 205.837 | 165.792 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2406.499 | 2368.267 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 19.591 | 17.829 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 25.833 | 21.354 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1002.573 | 992.132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15019 | 10841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3333 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15019 | 10841 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3696 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3333 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2231 | 2243 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA Titan X Pascal | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP102 | GP102 |
Date de sortie | 10 March 2017 | 2 August 2016 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | $1,199 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 219 | 359 |
Prix maintenant | $826.98 | |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.48 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1582 MHz | 1531 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1481 MHz | 1417 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 11,340 gflops | 10,974 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Température maximale du GPU | 91 °C | |
Pipelines | 3584 | 3584 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 354.4 GTexel / s | 342.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 250 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 11,800 million | 11,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | 267 mm |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 11 GB | 12 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 484.4 GB / s | 480.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 352 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 11008 MHz | 10008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | GDDR5X |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |