NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA Quadro GV100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA Quadro GV100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1132 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1628 MHz
• 1200.9x more texture fill rate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 463.0 GTexel / s
• 2.1x more pipelines: 10496 vs 5120
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26747 vs 19824
• Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 vs 848
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191350 vs 143015
• Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 562.775
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 141.066
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1964.377
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 19663
• Around 70% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 19663

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro GV100

• Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 350 Watt
• Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 24 GB
• Around 39% higher memory clock speed: 1696 MHz vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro GV100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	26747 19824
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1050 848
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	191350 143015
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	732.196 562.775
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	247.569 141.066
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2441.384 1964.377
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 19663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	33398 19663
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3713 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3354 3357

Compare specifications (specs)