AMD Radeon R7 M370 versus AMD FirePro M4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 M370 and AMD FirePro M4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 M370
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 900 MHz versus 675 MHz
- Environ 7% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 23.04 GTexel / s versus 21.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 7% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 737.3 gflops versus 691.2 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 65% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 676 versus 410
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7038 versus 5532
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 17.26 versus 15.659
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 476.075 versus 424.37
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 versus 27 June 2012 |
Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz versus 675 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.04 GTexel / s versus 21.6 GTexel / s |
Performance á point flottant | 737.3 gflops versus 691.2 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 versus 410 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7038 versus 5532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.26 versus 15.659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 versus 424.37 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.082 versus 30.072 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M4000
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 512 versus 384
- 4x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4000 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1593 versus 1418
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.67 versus 1.653
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 79.304 versus 70.174
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2189 versus 1747
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3539 versus 1484
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 versus 2449
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2189 versus 1747
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3539 versus 1484
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 versus 2449
Caractéristiques | |
Pipelines | 512 versus 384 |
Vitesse de mémoire | 4000 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1593 versus 1418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.67 versus 1.653 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 79.304 versus 70.174 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2189 versus 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3539 versus 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 2449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2189 versus 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3539 versus 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 2449 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M370
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M4000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R7 M370 | AMD FirePro M4000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1418 | 1593 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 410 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7038 | 5532 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.26 | 15.659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 | 424.37 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.653 | 1.67 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.082 | 30.072 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.174 | 79.304 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | 2189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1484 | 3539 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2449 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 | 2189 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1484 | 3539 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2449 | 3357 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R7 M370 | AMD FirePro M4000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Nom de code | Litho | Chelsea |
Conception | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | |
Date de sortie | 5 May 2015 | 27 June 2012 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 948 | 950 |
Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 960 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 900 MHz | 675 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 737.3 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 23.04 GTexel / s | 21.6 GTexel / s |
Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,500 million |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Eyefinity | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | n / a |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Facteur de forme | MXM-A | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_1) |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 73.6 GB / s | 72 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore |