NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) versus AMD FirePro W5000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and AMD FirePro W5000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 4 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 81% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 825 MHz
- Environ 96% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 77.76 GTexel / s versus 39.6 GTexel / s
- Environ 96% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,488 gflops versus 1,267 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 4.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 350 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 2.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 3200 MHz
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 versus 2974
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20122 versus 10275
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 versus 771.327
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 versus 2.758
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 4308
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 4308
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 7 August 2012 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 825 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s versus 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops versus 1,267 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 350 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 3200 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 versus 2974 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20122 versus 10275 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 versus 771.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 versus 2.758 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 4308 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro W5000
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 568 versus 323
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 versus 3687
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 3336
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 versus 3687
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 3336
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 568 versus 323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 versus 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3336 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD FirePro W5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | 2974 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 568 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20122 | 10275 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 771.327 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 2.758 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 4308 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3359 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2336 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD FirePro W5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GP106B | Pitcairn |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 7 August 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 554 | 556 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $599 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops | 1,267 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s | 39.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 2,800 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Compte DisplayPort | 2 | |
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Facteur de forme | Full Height / Half Length | |
| Longeur | 183 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 102.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro W5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon R7 260
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop)
