AMD Radeon E8950 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon E8950 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon E8950
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- Environ 1% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1000 MHz versus 993 MHz
- Environ 1% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 128.0 GTexel / s versus 127.1 GTexel / s
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1536
- Environ 34% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,096 gflops versus 3,050 gflops
- Environ 28% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 95 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 66.837 versus 46.273
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1369.722 versus 777.677
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.633 versus 3.914
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.836 versus 38.196
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 326.391 versus 82.511
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 29 September 2015 versus 12 March 2014 |
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz versus 993 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.0 GTexel / s versus 127.1 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 1536 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,096 gflops versus 3,050 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt versus 122 Watt |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.837 versus 46.273 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1369.722 versus 777.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.633 versus 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.836 versus 38.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 326.391 versus 82.511 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Environ 30% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 735 MHz
Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 735 MHz |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon E8950
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon E8950 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M |
---|---|---|
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 66.837 | 46.273 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1369.722 | 777.677 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.633 | 3.914 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.836 | 38.196 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 326.391 | 82.511 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3818 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 333 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon E8950 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Kepler |
Nom de code | Amethyst | GK104 |
Date de sortie | 29 September 2015 | 12 March 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 771 | 773 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 993 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 735 MHz | 954 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 4,096 gflops | 3,050 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1536 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 128.0 GTexel / s | 127.1 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 95 Watt | 122 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,000 million | 3,540 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | MXM-B (3.0) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.0 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Blu-Ray | ||
BatteryBoost | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
GPU Boost | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |