AMD Radeon HD 6950 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 6950 and NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6950
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 70.4 GTexel / s versus 25.1 billion / sec
- 7.3x plus de pipelines: 1408 versus 192
- 3.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,252.8 gflops versus 601.3 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 97% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2602 versus 1322
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 445 versus 310
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6105 versus 4907
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 16.999 versus 14.758
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 899.056 versus 302.509
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.659 versus 0.965
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.698 versus 14.925
- 9.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 251.203 versus 27.656
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3652 versus 2160
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11657 versus 3325
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3652 versus 2160
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11657 versus 3325
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 14 December 2010 versus 13 September 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 70.4 GTexel / s versus 25.1 billion / sec |
Pipelines | 1408 versus 192 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,252.8 gflops versus 601.3 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2602 versus 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 versus 310 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6105 versus 4907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.999 versus 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 899.056 versus 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.659 versus 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.698 versus 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.203 versus 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3652 versus 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11657 versus 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3652 versus 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11657 versus 3325 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- 4.7x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 106 Watt versus 500 Watt
- Environ 44% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3365 versus 2523
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3365 versus 2523
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 106 Watt versus 500 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz versus 1250 MHz |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 versus 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 versus 2523 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6950
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon HD 6950 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2602 | 1322 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 445 | 310 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6105 | 4907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 16.999 | 14.758 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 899.056 | 302.509 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.659 | 0.965 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.698 | 14.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.203 | 27.656 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3652 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2523 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11657 | 3325 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3652 | 2160 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2523 | 3365 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11657 | 3325 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon HD 6950 | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | TeraScale 3 | Fermi |
Nom de code | Cayman | GF106 |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Date de sortie | 14 December 2010 | 13 September 2010 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | $129 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 686 | 1130 |
Prix maintenant | $89.99 | $64.99 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 45.34 | 26.46 |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,252.8 gflops | 601.3 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1408 | 192 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 70.4 GTexel / s | 25.1 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 500 Watt | 106 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,640 million | 1,170 million |
Vitesse du noyau | 1566 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 100 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Longeur | 267 mm | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | 6-pin |
Hauteur | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 11 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.2 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 57.7 GB / s | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |