NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX versus AMD Radeon HD 6950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX and AMD Radeon HD 6950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 31% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 92.2 billion / sec versus 70.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 9% de pipelines plus haut: 1536 versus 1408
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 4.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 122 Watt versus 500 Watt
- 2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 2500 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3593 versus 2599
- 2x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 12225 versus 6105
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 25.421 versus 16.999
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.31 versus 1.659
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5683 versus 3652
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3571 versus 2523
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5683 versus 3652
- Environ 42% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3571 versus 2523
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 23 October 2012 versus 14 December 2010 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 92.2 billion / sec versus 70.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 versus 1408 |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt versus 500 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3593 versus 2599 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12225 versus 6105 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.421 versus 16.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.31 versus 1.659 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5683 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3571 versus 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5683 versus 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3571 versus 2523 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6950
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 899.056 versus 734.936
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 49.698 versus 35.434
- 4.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 251.203 versus 56.706
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11657 versus 3336
- 3.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11657 versus 3336
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 442 versus 440 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 899.056 versus 734.936 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.698 versus 35.434 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 251.203 versus 56.706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11657 versus 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11657 versus 3336 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6950
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | AMD Radeon HD 6950 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3593 | 2599 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 440 | 442 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12225 | 6105 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 25.421 | 16.999 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 734.936 | 899.056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.31 | 1.659 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.434 | 49.698 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 56.706 | 251.203 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5683 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3571 | 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 11657 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5683 | 3652 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3571 | 2523 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 11657 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX | AMD Radeon HD 6950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 3 |
Date de sortie | 23 October 2012 | 14 December 2010 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 707 | 709 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Nom de code | Cayman | |
Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 45.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 720 MHz | |
Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1408 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 92.2 billion / sec | 70.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 122 Watt | 500 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 3540 Million | 2,640 million |
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | |
Performance á point flottant | 2,252.8 gflops | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Options SLI | 2-way | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Longeur | 267 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2500 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
FXAA | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
CrossFire | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA |