AMD Radeon R7 250X versus AMD Radeon HD 6970
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 250X and AMD Radeon HD 6970 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 250X
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 14% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1000 MHz versus 880 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 6.9x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 550 Watt
- Environ 18% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1625 MHz versus 1375 MHz
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 637 versus 432
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 32.22 versus 18.676
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.963 versus 1.835
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2014 versus 14 December 2010 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz versus 880 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 550 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz versus 1375 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 versus 432 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.22 versus 18.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.963 versus 1.835 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6970
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 84.5 GTexel / s versus 38 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 640
- 2.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,703.4 gflops versus 1,216 gflops
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2839 versus 2269
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 920.398 versus 638.532
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 273.175 versus 151.963
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5372 versus 3916
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5372 versus 3916
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 84.5 GTexel / s versus 38 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,703.4 gflops versus 1,216 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2839 versus 2269 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 920.398 versus 638.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.219 versus 51.987 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 273.175 versus 151.963 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5372 versus 3916 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5372 versus 3916 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 250X
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6970
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 250X | AMD Radeon HD 6970 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2269 | 2839 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 637 | 432 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 32.22 | 18.676 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.532 | 920.398 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.963 | 1.835 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 51.987 | 52.219 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.963 | 273.175 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3916 | 5372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3916 | 5372 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3716 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35739 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 250X | AMD Radeon HD 6970 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Nom de code | Cape Verde | Cayman |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 13 February 2014 | 14 December 2010 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | $369 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 659 | 662 |
| Prix maintenant | $260.70 | $94.99 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.25 | 48.01 |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1000 MHz | 880 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,216 gflops | 2,703.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Stream Processors | 640 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 38 GTexel / s | 84.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 550 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 2,640 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 210 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 96 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 250X avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
AMDRadeon HD 6970
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 5200
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
AMDFirePro D300
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
AMDRadeon R9 M280X
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
AMDFirePro W6150M
AMDRadeon R7 250X vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
