AMD Radeon Pro 450 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 450 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 450
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 4% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 800 MHz versus 771 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 2% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5080 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- 28.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3347 versus 117
- 16.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1749 versus 108.2
- 27.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 versus 119.7
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 October 2016 versus 8 November 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz versus 771 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3347 versus 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1749 versus 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 versus 119.7 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 102.0 GTexel / s versus 32 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 640
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,448 gflops versus 1,024 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.184 versus 26.707
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1002.196 versus 568.609
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.261 versus 2.409
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 54.752 versus 39.784
- 2.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6912 versus 3347
- 3.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6710 versus 1749
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 6703 versus 3344
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 102.0 GTexel / s versus 32 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 640 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,448 gflops versus 1,024 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.184 versus 26.707 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1002.196 versus 568.609 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.261 versus 2.409 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 54.752 versus 39.784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.579 versus 126.562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6912 versus 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 6710 versus 1749 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 6703 versus 3344 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2723 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 619 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 8915 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.707 | 33.184 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 568.609 | 1002.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.409 | 3.261 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 39.784 | 54.752 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 126.562 | 126.579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3347 | 6912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1749 | 6710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 6703 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3347 | 117 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1749 | 108.2 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 119.7 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 450 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Baffin | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 30 October 2016 | 8 November 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 788 | 887 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz | 771 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,024 gflops | 2,448 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 32 GTexel / s | 102.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 797 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 81.28 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 450 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 450 vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 380 XGL
AMDRadeon Pro 450 vs
ATIFireGL V7100
AMDRadeon Pro 450 vs
ATIMobility FireGL V5000
AMDRadeon Pro 450 vs
NVIDIATesla K20Xm
AMDRadeon Pro 450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 825M
AMDRadeon Pro 450 vs
IntelIris Pro Graphics 6200
