AMD Radeon Pro 560 versus AMD Radeon HD 6990
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 560 and AMD Radeon HD 6990 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 560
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 9% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 907 MHz versus 830 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 40 nm
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 375 Watt
- Environ 2% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5080 MHz versus 5000 MHz
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3475 versus 3013
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 724 versus 630
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 41.388 versus 17.264
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.837 versus 1.76
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4695 versus 4562
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4695 versus 4562
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 versus 8 March 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz versus 830 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 375 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz versus 5000 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 versus 3013 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 versus 630 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 versus 17.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 versus 1.76 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 versus 4562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 versus 4562 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6990
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 58.05 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 2x 1536 versus 1024
- 2.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2x 2,549.8 gflops versus 1,858 gflops
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 840.452 versus 614.695
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.903 versus 31.274
- Environ 40% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 265.302 versus 189.085
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 versus 2280
- Environ 63% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 versus 2280
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec versus 58.05 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2x 1536 versus 1024 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2x 2,549.8 gflops versus 1,858 gflops |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 840.452 versus 614.695 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.903 versus 31.274 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 265.302 versus 189.085 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 versus 2280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 versus 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 versus 2280 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 versus 3349 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 560
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6990
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon HD 6990 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3475 | 3013 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 724 | 630 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15828 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 41.388 | 17.264 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 614.695 | 840.452 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.837 | 1.76 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 31.274 | 53.903 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 189.085 | 265.302 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4695 | 4562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2280 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4695 | 4562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2280 | 3713 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon HD 6990 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Nom de code | Polaris 21 | Antilles |
| Date de sortie | 18 April 2017 | 8 March 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 624 | 626 |
| Genre | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $699 | |
| Prix maintenant | $159.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 27.81 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 907 MHz | 830 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,858 gflops | 2x 2,549.8 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2x 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 58.05 GTexel / s | 2x 79.7 GTexel / s billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 375 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,000 million | 2,640 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 8-pin |
| Longeur | 295 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2x 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 81.28 GB / s | 2x 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 2x 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5080 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HDMI 2.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro 560 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
ATIFirePro V9800
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6990
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon RX 540 OEM
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega M GL
AMDRadeon Pro 560 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4
