AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 versus AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 249.6 GTexel/s versus 268.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 versus 9580
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.678 versus 12.49
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 versus 857.575
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 versus 8673
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 versus 3361
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 versus 8673
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 versus 3361
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 19 March 2019 versus 24 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s versus 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 versus 9580 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 versus 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 versus 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 versus 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 versus 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 versus 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 versus 3361 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 3072
- 45.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 275 Watt versus 12500 million
- Environ 34% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1050 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 799 versus 784
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 155.307 versus 135.416
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 versus 3063.269
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 versus 3947
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 versus 3947
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 3072 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt versus 12500 million |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 799 versus 784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 155.307 versus 135.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 versus 3063.269 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 versus 3947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 versus 3947 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | 9580 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 799 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53780 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | 3431.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 3361 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | Greenland | Fiji |
| Génération GCN | GCN 5.0 | |
| Date de sortie | 19 March 2019 | 24 June 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 237 | 235 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 275 Watt |
| Unités de Compute | 64 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 8,602 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Compte de transistor | 8,900 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Longeur | 191 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 402.4 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AppleM2 Max 30-core
