AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 versus AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 and AMD Radeon R9 FURY X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 24% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1300 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 249.6 GTexel/s versus 268.8 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11300 versus 9576
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 12.678 versus 12.49
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 883.876 versus 857.575
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11925 versus 8673
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10411 versus 3361
- Environ 37% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11925 versus 8673
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10411 versus 3361
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 19 March 2019 versus 24 June 2015 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s versus 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 4 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 versus 9576 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 versus 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 versus 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 versus 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 versus 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 versus 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 versus 3361 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
- Environ 33% de pipelines plus haut: 4096 versus 3072
- 45.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 275 Watt versus 12500 million
- Environ 34% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1050 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective)
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 796 versus 784
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 155.307 versus 135.416
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3431.249 versus 3063.269
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8925 versus 3947
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8925 versus 3947
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 4096 versus 3072 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt versus 12500 million |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz versus 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 796 versus 784 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 155.307 versus 135.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3431.249 versus 3063.269 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8925 versus 3947 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8925 versus 3947 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11300 | 9576 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 784 | 796 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53770 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 135.416 | 155.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3063.269 | 3431.249 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.678 | 12.49 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 883.876 | 857.575 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 11925 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3947 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 10411 | 3361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 11925 | 8673 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3947 | 8925 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 10411 | 3361 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.089 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5170 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 | AMD Radeon R9 FURY X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Vega 10 PRO | GCN 3.0 |
| Nom de code | Greenland | Fiji |
| Génération GCN | GCN 5.0 | |
| Date de sortie | 19 March 2019 | 24 June 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 236 | 237 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 Fury Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1300 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1200 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 15.97 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 4096 |
| Pixel fill rate | 83.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 249.6 GTexel/s | 268.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 12500 million | 275 Watt |
| Unités de Compute | 64 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 8,602 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 4096 | |
| Compte de transistor | 8,900 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Nombre d’écrans Eyefinity | 6 | |
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | ||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Longeur | 191 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 2x 8-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| Mantle | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Mémoire de la bande passante haute (HBM) | ||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 402.4 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 2048 bit | 4096 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 786 MHz (1572 MHz effective) | 1050 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | HBM2 | High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) |
Technologies |
||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| FRTC | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48 avec des autres
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon R9 FURY X
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M6000 24 GB
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5700
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6400
AMDRadeon Pro Vega 48 vs
AppleM2 Max 30-core
