AMD Radeon R4 Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce 840M

Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R4 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 840M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R4 Graphics

  • La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
  • 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
  • Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 versus 5771
Caractéristiques
Date de sortie 11 June 2014 versus 12 March 2014
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
Référence
Geekbench - OpenCL 8386 versus 5771

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 840M

  • Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 800 MHz
  • times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 17.98 GTexel / s versus 6.4 GTexel / s
  • 3x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 128
  • 4.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 863.2 gflops versus 204.8 gflops
  • 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1096 versus 342
  • Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 151 versus 99
  • 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.848 versus 4.721
  • Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 162.594 versus 107.613
  • 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.237 versus 0.445
  • Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 versus 10.612
  • 7.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 versus 13.097
  • 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 versus 701
  • 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 versus 1338
  • Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3191 versus 1811
  • 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 versus 701
  • 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 versus 1338
  • Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3191 versus 1811
Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau 1029 MHz versus 800 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture 17.98 GTexel / s versus 6.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 versus 128
Performance á point flottant 863.2 gflops versus 204.8 gflops
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark 1096 versus 342
PassMark - G2D Mark 151 versus 99
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 22.848 versus 4.721
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 162.594 versus 107.613
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.237 versus 0.445
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 21.15 versus 10.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 95.545 versus 13.097
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2085 versus 701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2736 versus 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3191 versus 1811
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2085 versus 701
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2736 versus 1338
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3191 versus 1811

Comparer les références

GPU 1: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
342
1096
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
99
151
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
8386
5771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
4.721
22.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
107.613
162.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.445
1.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.612
21.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
13.097
95.545
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
701
2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1338
2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1811
3191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
701
2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1338
2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1811
3191
Nom AMD Radeon R4 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce 840M
PassMark - G3D Mark 342 1096
PassMark - G2D Mark 99 151
Geekbench - OpenCL 8386 5771
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 4.721 22.848
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 107.613 162.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.445 1.237
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 10.612 21.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 13.097 95.545
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 701 2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1338 2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1811 3191
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 701 2085
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1338 2736
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1811 3191
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 503

Comparer les caractéristiques

AMD Radeon R4 Graphics NVIDIA GeForce 840M

Essentiel

Architecture GCN 2.0 Maxwell
Nom de code Beema GM108
Date de sortie 11 June 2014 12 March 2014
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance 1540 1235
Genre Desktop Laptop

Infos techniques

Vitesse du noyau 800 MHz 1029 MHz
Performance á point flottant 204.8 gflops 863.2 gflops
Processus de fabrication 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 128 384
Taux de remplissage de la texture 6.4 GTexel / s 17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 33 Watt
Compte de transistor 930 million
Vitesse augmenté 1124 MHz

Sorties et ports de vidéo

Connecteurs d’écran No outputs No outputs

Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences

Interface IGP PCIe 3.0 x8
Soutien de bus PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
Taille du laptop medium sized

Soutien API

DirectX 12.0 (12_0) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.5 4.5

Mémoire

Genre de mémoire System Shared DDR3
RAM maximale 4 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire 16.02 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire 64 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire 2002 MHz
Mémoire partagé 0

Technologies

CUDA
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
Optimus