AMD Radeon R4 Graphics versus NVIDIA GeForce 840M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R4 Graphics and NVIDIA GeForce 840M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- 2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 33 Watt
- Environ 45% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8386 versus 5771
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 11 June 2014 versus 12 March 2014 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 33 Watt |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 versus 5771 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 840M
- Environ 29% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1029 MHz versus 800 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 17.98 GTexel / s versus 6.4 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 128
- 4.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 863.2 gflops versus 204.8 gflops
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1096 versus 342
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 151 versus 99
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 22.848 versus 4.721
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 162.594 versus 107.613
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.237 versus 0.445
- Environ 99% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.15 versus 10.612
- 7.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 95.545 versus 13.097
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2085 versus 701
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2736 versus 1338
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3191 versus 1811
- 3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2085 versus 701
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2736 versus 1338
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3191 versus 1811
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1029 MHz versus 800 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.98 GTexel / s versus 6.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 versus 128 |
Performance á point flottant | 863.2 gflops versus 204.8 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1096 versus 342 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 151 versus 99 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.848 versus 4.721 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 162.594 versus 107.613 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.237 versus 0.445 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.15 versus 10.612 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 95.545 versus 13.097 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2085 versus 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2736 versus 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3191 versus 1811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2085 versus 701 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2736 versus 1338 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3191 versus 1811 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 840M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 840M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 342 | 1096 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 99 | 151 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8386 | 5771 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.721 | 22.848 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 107.613 | 162.594 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.445 | 1.237 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.612 | 21.15 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 13.097 | 95.545 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 701 | 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1338 | 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1811 | 3191 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 701 | 2085 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1338 | 2736 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1811 | 3191 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 503 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics | NVIDIA GeForce 840M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Maxwell |
Nom de code | Beema | GM108 |
Date de sortie | 11 June 2014 | 12 March 2014 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1540 | 1235 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse du noyau | 800 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 204.8 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 384 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 6.4 GTexel / s | 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 33 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 930 million | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1124 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3 |
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 16.02 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 2002 MHz | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |