AMD Radeon R5 Graphics versus Intel HD Graphics 500
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R5 Graphics and Intel HD Graphics 500 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 7% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 800 MHz versus 750 MHz
- Environ 35% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 12.13 GTexel / s versus 9 GTexel / s
- 21.3x plus de pipelines: 256 versus 12
- 2.7x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 388.1 gflops versus 144.0 gflops
- 3.3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 2903 versus 889
- Environ 75% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 6.166 versus 3.525
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 119.568 versus 35.665
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.543 versus 0.215
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 12.649 versus 2.987
- 10.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 42.459 versus 4.154
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 966 versus 488
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1363 versus 579
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1915 versus 1122
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 966 versus 488
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1363 versus 579
- Environ 71% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1915 versus 1122
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 versus 1 September 2015 |
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz versus 750 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s versus 9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 256 versus 12 |
Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops versus 144.0 gflops |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2903 versus 889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 versus 3.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 versus 35.665 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 versus 0.215 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 versus 2.987 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 versus 4.154 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 versus 488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 versus 579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 versus 1122 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 versus 488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 versus 579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 versus 1122 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 500
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 6 Watt versus 15 Watt
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 6 Watt versus 15 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 500
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2903 | 889 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.166 | 3.525 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 119.568 | 35.665 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.543 | 0.215 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.649 | 2.987 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 42.459 | 4.154 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 966 | 488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1363 | 579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1915 | 1122 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 966 | 488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1363 | 579 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1915 | 1122 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 299 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 81 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 500 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Generation 9.0 |
Nom de code | Wani | Apollo Lake GT1 |
Date de sortie | 31 May 2016 | 1 September 2015 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1555 | 1645 |
Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | 750 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 200 MHz | 200 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 388.1 gflops | 144.0 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | 12 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 12.13 GTexel / s | 9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 6 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 2,410 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
Genre de mémoire | System Shared | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync |