AMD Radeon R6 M255DX versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R6 M255DX and NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 50% de pipelines plus haut: 576 versus 384
- 6.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 17123 versus 2683
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3563 versus 3341
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3563 versus 3341
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2014 versus 1 October 2012 |
| Pipelines | 576 versus 384 |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17123 versus 2683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3563 versus 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3563 versus 3341 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1913 versus 1055
- Environ 81% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1913 versus 1055
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3670 versus 1927
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3670 versus 1927
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 164 versus 116
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 936 versus 605
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1913 versus 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1913 versus 1055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3670 versus 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3670 versus 1927 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 164 versus 116 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 936 versus 605 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R6 M255DX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R6 M255DX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17123 | 2683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1055 | 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1055 | 1913 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 | 3670 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 | 3670 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3563 | 3341 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3563 | 3341 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 116 | 164 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 605 | 936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.493 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 285.42 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.863 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 17.242 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.116 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R6 M255DX | NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Jet | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 7 January 2014 | 1 October 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1186 | 1187 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 855 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 780 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 576 | 384 |
| Compte de transistor | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
| Noyaux CUDA | 384 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 544.5 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 22.7 billion / sec | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| Enduro | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R6 M255DX avec des autres
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3400
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 650M
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645M
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
AMDFirePro W2100
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940M
AMDRadeon R6 M255DX vs
AMDRadeon R8 M350DX
