AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 88% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 65 Watt versus 122 Watt
- Environ 58% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 525 versus 333
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 41.414 versus 36.688
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 112.347 versus 82.511
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 versus 12 March 2014 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt versus 122 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 525 versus 333 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 versus 36.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 versus 82.511 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 925 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 127.1 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s
- 3x plus de pipelines: 1536 versus 512
- 3.2x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 3,050 gflops versus 947.2 gflops
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 8 GB versus 2 GB
- Environ 98% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 3818 versus 1931
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 15023 versus 9800
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 34.42 versus 24.788
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 776.776 versus 638.196
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.915 versus 2.619
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4501 versus 2809
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 versus 3666
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4501 versus 2809
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 versus 3666
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 925 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 127.1 GTexel / s versus 29.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 versus 512 |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,050 gflops versus 947.2 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 8 GB versus 2 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3818 versus 1931 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 15023 versus 9800 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 34.42 versus 24.788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 776.776 versus 638.196 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.915 versus 2.619 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4501 versus 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 versus 3666 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4501 versus 2809 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 versus 3666 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1931 | 3818 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 525 | 333 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9800 | 15023 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.788 | 34.42 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 638.196 | 776.776 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.619 | 3.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 41.414 | 36.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 112.347 | 82.511 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2809 | 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3666 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2809 | 4501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3666 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1611 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Cape Verde | GK104 |
| Date de sortie | 30 June 2016 | 12 March 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 785 | 786 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 925 MHz | 954 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 947.2 gflops | 3,050 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 512 | 1536 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.6 GTexel / s | 127.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 122 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,500 million | 3,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 993 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 1536 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 72 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4500 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R7 450 OEM avec des autres
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro4 380 XGL
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
ATIFireGL V7100
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIATesla M2070-Q
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIATesla C2075
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 880M
AMDRadeon R7 450 OEM vs
NVIDIAQuadro M1200 Mobile
