AMD Radeon R9 290 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon R9 290 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 290
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 93% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 151.5 GTexel / s versus 78.4 billion / sec
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 2560 versus 960
- 2.4x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,849 gflops versus 1,981 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 833.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8210 versus 4017
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 763 versus 487
- 9x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 102277 versus 11364
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 89.325 versus 30.505
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1366.314 versus 705.293
- 3.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 10.034 versus 3.085
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.765 versus 35.416
- 8.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 540.645 versus 62.69
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6300 versus 3581
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3711 versus 3690
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6300 versus 3581
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3711 versus 3690
- 2.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3699 versus 1307
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 5 November 2013 versus 6 September 2012 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 151.5 GTexel / s versus 78.4 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 2560 versus 960 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,849 gflops versus 1,981 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz versus 6.0 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8210 versus 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 763 versus 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 102277 versus 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.325 versus 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1366.314 versus 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.034 versus 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.765 versus 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 540.645 versus 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6300 versus 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 versus 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6300 versus 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 versus 3690 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3699 versus 1307 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Environ 3% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 947 MHz
- Environ 96% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 140 Watt versus 275 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 947 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 140 Watt versus 275 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3365 versus 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3365 versus 3354 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R9 290
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon R9 290 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8210 | 4017 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 763 | 487 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 102277 | 11364 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.325 | 30.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1366.314 | 705.293 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.034 | 3.085 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.765 | 35.416 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 540.645 | 62.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6300 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3711 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 3365 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6300 | 3581 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3711 | 3690 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 3365 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3699 | 1307 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon R9 290 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Kepler |
| Nom de code | Hawaii | GK106 |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Date de sortie | 5 November 2013 | 6 September 2012 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $399 | $229 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 339 | 740 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix maintenant | $349.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 14.35 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 947 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,849 gflops | 1,981 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2560 | 960 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 151.5 GTexel / s | 78.4 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 275 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6,200 million | 2,540 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1033 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | 960 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| VGA | ||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 275 mm | 9.5" (24.1 cm) |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | One 6-pin |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 320.0 GB / s | 144.2 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 512 Bit | 192-bit GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5000 MHz | 6.0 GB/s |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon R9 290 avec des autres
AMDRadeon R9 290 vs
ATIFireMV 2260
AMDRadeon R9 290 vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
AMDRadeon R9 290 vs
AMDFirePro W9000
AMDRadeon R9 290 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX TITAN Z
AMDRadeon R9 290 vs
NVIDIAQuadro M5000
AMDRadeon R9 290 vs
AMDRadeon RX 580
